Introduction
In India, where women face considerable obstacles in getting healthcare and making decisions about their bodies, reproductive rights and women’s health are crucial problems. India has many rules and regulations governing women’s health and reproductive rights, making it challenging to understand them. Examining pertinent case laws and academic research, this article will examine reproductive rights and women’s health in India from a legal standpoint.
Reproductive Rights
In India, the ability to obtain contraception is a fundamental reproductive right. However, societal and economic constraints mean that many women have limited access to contraception. Only 36% of married women in India utilize modern contraception, according to a 2020 survey. Additionally, shame and discrimination are commonplace for women who use contraceptives, especially in rural regions.
Another reproductive freedom that is protected by Indian law is the right to choose to undergo an abortion. In 2021, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, which had been approved in 1971, was changed to raise the legal limit for abortion from 20 to 24 weeks. The pregnancy poses a risk to the woman’s bodily or mental health or is the result of rape or incest, for example, and in these situations, the law permits women to have an abortion. However, there are few safe and legal abortion clinics in India, especially in the country’s rural areas, where there are also few qualified medical professionals and few people who are aware of reproductive health issues.
Another facet of reproductive rights in India is access to fertility treatments. In order to control fertility treatments in India, the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Regulation Bill was introduced in 2020. The law suggests creating a regulating authority to watch over fertility clinics and make sure they abide by moral and security standards. Additionally, the bill calls for outlawing both commercial surrogacy and sex selection.
Women’s Health
In India, having access to healthcare is crucial for women’s health. However, many Indian women encounter substantial obstacles while trying to receive healthcare, especially in rural areas. In contrast to 76% of women in urban areas, only 34% of women in India’s rural areas have access to healthcare facilities within 5 kilometers of their homes, according to a 2018 survey.
Another area of importance for women’s health in India is maternal health. With 113 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 2016, India’s maternal mortality rate is quite high. The government has put in place a number of initiatives and programmes to enhance maternal health, like the Janani Suraksha Yojana, which offers financial incentives to women who give birth in hospitals. However, access to maternal healthcare is still limited in many parts of the country.
Relevant Case Laws
There have been several landmark case laws in India related to reproductive rights and women’s health. In 2017, the Supreme Court of India ruled that women have the right to choose to have an abortion, even if the pregnancy is beyond the legal limit of 20 weeks. The court held that the right to life includes the right to reproductive autonomy and bodily integrity. Here are some relevant case laws regarding reproductive rights and women’s health from a legal perspective in India:
1. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): This case established sexual harassment as a violation of fundamental rights, including the right to life and liberty guaranteed by the Constitution of India.
2. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1997): This case dealt with the issue of hazardous industries and their effect on the health of workers and the environment. The Supreme Court held that the right to life includes the right to a healthy environment and that the government has a duty to protect the same.
3. Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration (2009): This case dealt with the issue of reproductive rights of women and held that a woman’s decision to terminate a pregnancy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
4. Laxmi Mandal v. Deen Dayal Harinagar Hospital (2008): This case dealt with the issue of the right to emergency medical care for pregnant women. The Supreme Court held that hospitals cannot deny treatment to pregnant women in an emergency situation on the basis of financial constraints.
5. Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (2018): This case dealt with the issue of the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The Supreme Court held that the exclusion of women between the ages of 10 and 50 years from the temple violated their constitutional rights and was discriminatory.
These are just a few examples of the many cases that have shaped the legal framework around reproductive rights and women’s health in India.
Further, “Women’s Autonomy and Reproductive Health Care Utilization in India: A Multilevel Analysis” by Srinivas Goli, Rajith Kumar K, and S. Irudaya Rajan, published in the Journal of Biosocial Science in 2016 is an important research study in this matter which talks about the relationship between women’s autonomy and their utilization of reproductive health care services in India. The authors use data from the National Family Health Survey conducted in 2005-2006, which collected information on various aspects of reproductive health care utilization and women’s autonomy indicators such as decision-making power, freedom of movement, and financial autonomy.
The study’s findings imply that women’s autonomy and the use of reproductive health care services in India are positively correlated. More specifically, women who have greater levels of financial independence, freedom of movement, and decision-making authority are more likely to utilise contraceptive, seek antenatal care, and have skilled delivery attendants. The study also discovers that there are differences in the relationship between women’s autonomy and the use of reproductive health care at several levels of analysis, including the state, community, and individual levels. For instance, at the personal level rather than the state level, there is a larger positive correlation between women’s autonomy and the use of reproductive health care.
Overall, the study emphasizes the necessity for policies and programmes that enable women to make knowledgeable decisions about their reproductive health and the significance of women’s autonomy in enhancing the utilization of reproductive health care in India.
Conclusion
Women’s health and reproductive rights are important issues that demand consideration from the legal, social, and healthcare spheres. It is crucial to understand that women’s reproductive health is a question of social justice, equality, and human rights in addition to being a personal concern. Over time, the legal framework surrounding women’s health and reproductive rights has changed, and a number of significant cases have influenced India’s legal system.
In addition, studies have shown how important women’s autonomy is to increasing the uptake of reproductive health services. To ensure women’s general well-being and advance gender equality, it is essential to give them the information and tools they need to make educated decisions about their reproductive health. Implementing policies and programmes that support women’s autonomy and lower obstacles to accessing reproductive health care is therefore essential to address gender-based discrimination in all its forms.
In conclusion, reproductive rights and women’s health are essential aspects of human rights and social justice. By recognizing and addressing the various challenges faced by women in accessing reproductive health care services, we can ensure that women have the freedom and agency to make informed choices about their bodies, their health, and their lives.
The author is a 3rd year Law student at the University of Kashmir. Feedback at [email protected]
Related
